in Uncategorized

Ruminations on the future of “local” content on the Web

I had cause to write up some thoughts on the future of local content on the Web. I thought it’d be good to get this out in the larger world and maybe get others’ take. This is very web-focused (because of my original reasons for writing it).

It’s not about the site

Very few sites are able to claim “destination” appeal. Banking on “” to be *the business* is tragically short-sighted. The challenge is figuring out how to get that content to where the users are. I’m a fan of things like the integration of local content with RSS feeds of frequently updated local information could also work (I access and Upcoming,org solely through my feedreader).

Local == Mobile

If you’re truly seeking a next-gen experience, having a clear vision for mobile is crucial. Local information is most valuable in the moment, on the street. I can’t tell you how often I punch up Google Maps on my iPhone, or do Chowhound or Google searches when I’m out and about. As mobile devices evolve and increasingly embed themselves in people’s lives, local content must be available on the street.

Be a good web citizen

Content sites, particularly those that have been around for years, tend towards a publishing model that is more concerned with “stickiness” then with truly valuable customer experiences. Open up your content to others; receive content for other sources. Imagine events and geotagged Flickr photos integrated with the local-business profile pages.

Assist decision support

This requires some research to understand more fully, but I suspect (based on my experience and what I’ve seen with others) that the biggest challenge facing local content sites is not the content itself, but is about helping people make decisions about what to do and where to go. Right now, none of these sites offer strong tools for decision support over time — apart from saving a business’ profile page. I’m talking about things like on-the-fly comparison charts; saving collections of items and share it with others; placing a selected set of choices on a map; and asking questions (think for local-specific matters could all help users not just find information but figure out what to really do with it.

  1. I am only interested in user experience because I am a user and not a designer. I do not see the web as links or conversations but as dynamic bibliography and as space for shifting, challenging and re-orientating my thinking.

    I agree that life is only life when it moves but that movement is not necessarily mobility. In that regard movement can become a waste but mobility itself can be redefined as that which makes the user (A.K.A me) most alive.

    I also appreciate discovering discovering here the observational nature of IxD (first time I have been acquainted with the term), and as a user I appreciate designers that acknowledge that I do live in the real world. That simple attitudinal shift is an intelligent way going forward in a world where we the users can now also observe designers.

    In that regard we all become designers of something, whether that be improved interactive interfaces or the designing of an individual existence.

    When observation becomes emergent experience we benefit, but when observation is commented on or hardened into a viewpoint or a theoretical construct, it often serves to lose the true essence in the design capacity – if not also preventing us to reach the new levels of our own design capability. So if there is one thing that has fundamentally changed about the world of design is that due to interaction become an expanding thinking and/or a more mobile space, we are all becoming designers.


Comments are closed.


  • links for 2007-10-30 (Leapfroglog) November 6, 2007

    […] :: Ruminations on the future of “local” content on the Web Thoughts from Merholz on the future of local content on the web. His last point, supporting decision making, is certainly an interesting IxD problem. (tags: IxD UX local mobile content interactiondesign userexperience) […]