I’ve been looking up California employment codes, and came across this today.

The Fair Employment and Housing Act, includes a provision on the Right to Wear Pants.

Libraries and museums are typically thought of as outdated, staid, stodgy, dusty institutions; places your forced to go as a school child and often don’t bother returning to as an adult. So one of the things that surprised me as I programmed the IDEA conference is how many of the best examples of institutions that are truly embracing cross-channel and cross-media information architecture come from museums and libraries. In fact, I couldn’t find a corporate world entity that engages as well with the kinds of information complexity that these institutions do.

Though non-profit community institutions famously have less money than their corporate brethren, they (perhaps paradoxically) seem less risk-averse. Corporations have to do everything to protect the bottom line, and, as such, don’t mess with stuff that works. Libraries and museums have higher aspirations, which allow the more visionary ones the opportunity to take new approaches to engage with their audiences. The Museums and the Web conference is approaching its 11th year; Seattle and Minneapolis have new central libraries that do more to relate information with their communities; the Getty Center in L.A. hired Cooper to design kiosks and audio players that support the visitor experience; I’m sure you can think of others.

On 27 September (as they write it on the continent) I’ll be teaching an all-day workshop on Designing the Next Generation of Web Applications at the Shift conference, in Lisbon, Portugal. We’ve posted a detailed outline of what will be covered.

The main conference (28-29 September) is looking to be quite a good event. I’m most keen on appreciating the European perspective, something I sorely lack.

I subscribe to an daily email from the New York Times on their top news items from certain categories, including Business and Technology. Here is the section of those two categories from today’s email:

Everyday, there’s seems to be least one story that overlaps the two sections, and many days, two stories. I find it weird that NYT’s coverage of business is so constrained that technology is so dominant. Or is this just the reality of American business?

Up to Friday, September 15, you can register for the IDEA Conference for the discounted rates.

To tantalize you, we’ve just posted the National Park Service’s planned presentation on the conference blog. With tasty morsels such as:

The Challenges for Media Professionals

» NPS Innovations in Park Media— Harpers Ferry Center
The Center was established in 1970 to bring media specialists together in one place to share talents and resources. What have we learned from this experiment?

» Centralization (HFC, regions) vs. local control (parks)
In the mid-1990s the NPS shifted power from central offices to parks, making it more challenging to effect develop and enforce national standards in media. Who should set the media standards?

» Government model vs. business model
NPS media professionals are asked to work more like contractors in the private sector, but remain under the constraints of a bureaucracy. How can media planners, designers, and producers thrive in this sometimes contradictory environment?

» Insular model vs. partnership model
NPS sites have always been islands of government real estate within a secure boundary. Now we are more and more dependent on partners and volunteers to greet visitors and develop media. Are park rangers and NPS designers on the way out?

» Information (facts) vs. interpretation (minds & hearts)
Facts have lost favor in the NPS, with more energy going toward relevance and making emotional connections. What is the proper balance between information and inspiration?

» The virtual vs. the real
There have been reports that visitation to parks is declining, perhaps because many people, especially the young, are preoccupied with computers and digital media. Should the NPS be offering lots more digital and virtual experiences, or should we be focusing on providing opportunities to see and appreciate the real things that make up our natural and historical heritage?

Over on the IDEA Conference blog, I’ve posted the beginning of a discussion on information visualization, giving us all a peek into what Mike and Fernanda will be presenting at the conference.

Some choice quotes:

“At the conference, I’m hoping to talk about how to “democratize” visualization use (following successful deployments such as the NameVoyager vis)”

“I was super cautious about privacy and made a point of always explaining to my users (the owners of the email archives being visualized) that they would be the only ones looking at those visualizations. I explained to them that I would never show those images to anyone else without their consent. Well, as soon as people started playing with the visualizations, they wanted to share the images with others!!”

“If you look at the academic information visualization community, researchers aren’t focusing on the social side of their applications. Infovis folks love to explore techniques that allow them to scale the data they are showing. But what happens when you scale the audience that’s looking at a visualization? This is the question we are currently exploring.”

“I think a key success of the NameVoyager is to keep the data visualized *super simple*. It’s almost like there’s an inverse relationship between the complexity of the data, and the complexity of the conversation around the data.”

“I like the idea of visualization as an alert system for social information rather than a contemplative one, and we’ve made efforts to spur projects with this characteristic.”

“Fun fact: the original drafts of our Digg work were called “The Ultimate Stoner Tool”, because author & blogger Om Malik said during some panel that his favorite activity was smoking dope and watching Digg Spy scroll by.”

I listen to around 60 minutes of podcasts everyday (yay commuting), and while much of it is fine, rarely does it elevate to something special.

That happened recently, when I listened to the Kitchen Sisters’ “Hidden Kitchens” segment on Georgia Gilmore who cooked for the Civil Rights leaders in Montgomery, AL, including the Rev. Dr. King. The story elevates because of a combination of two factors — the amazing story of this simple kitchen as a hub of the civil rights movement, and the power of the voices sharing their reminisces.

You can listen to the podcast either directly from the Hidden Kitchens site, or through the iTunes music store.

Speaking of the National Park Service, clicking around their site, I found out that they have released a series of pictographs, symbols, arrows, and other map graphics, and all are free to use, because they’re the product of the federal government, and in the United States that means it’s in the public domain! You can get the imagery in PDF or Illustrator. This rocks pretty hard.

You can also download the map from any National Park brochure.

With the recent addition of Dave Cronin (interaction designer from Cooper, contributed to the GettyGuide kiosks and audio players) and the return of the National Park Service (design planner David Guiney), the IDEA conference program is now final!

As I mentioned in the latest IDEA blog post, we have an amazing array of contributors — designers, authors, technologists, artists, librarians. This multi-disciplinary approach will allow us to address the challenge of complex information spaces from a range of perspectives, and force us to remove our blinkers and broaden our vision.

There are 10 days remaining for the discounted registration. I hope to see you there!

I’m a words guy. And as a words guy, I’m easily rattled by verbal misuse. I get that language evolves and all that, but I also respect the power of words to communicate concepts clearly.

Anyway, this morning the SF Chronicle featured the headline “Coffee shop’s name has Standard & Poor’s in a froth.”. The place in question, Standard and Pours Coffee and Stocks, is not a coffee shop, but a coffeehouse.

As Merriam-Webster states, A “coffee shop” is a small restaurant. Typically, a diner-like restaurant, roadside eatery, basic American fare, as these examples attest.

My fight, however, is in vain, as a Google search for “coffee shop” demonstrates the language has shifted towards gourmet coffee, with links to Starbucks, starting your own espresso business, and the like.