Empowering Search through Genres
Posted on | April 17, 2005 | 5 Comments
Luke’s recent post challenging the design of search results pages reminded me that my original genre talk had another way to use document genres to improve the web experience.
When you use a search engine, say, Google, you get a list of ordered results. So, here’s what a search for “information architecture” returns.
Which is all well and good, if you want that particular tutorial, or Jesse’s particular set of resources. But, considering the 684,000 results, one gets the feeling that there could be more going on here.
Clusty, the hideously named search engine, uses algorithmic juju to identify related topics, and presents those with your results.
All right. I can’t argue that this is any better than Google’s results, because it’s unclear just how these topics are related. If you search on “information architecture” and then click “usability” or “web design,” just what are you going to get?
For my talk, I mocked up a Clusty interface that utilized genre as a filter:
The advantages, I hope, are clear. Utilizing genre allows the results to speak to whatever task the user brought to the search. If someone types “information architecture” into Google, they could be engaged in any number of tasks — self-teaching, looking for consulting help, looking for a definition, considering a career change, looking for a professional association, conducting research, etc. etc. Who knows? By offering genres as a filter, people can use that to narrow the results to those which are personally relevant at this time.
Comments
5 Responses to “Empowering Search through Genres”
Leave a Reply
Hello
Archives
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (9)
- December 2011 (7)
- September 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (7)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (16)
- January 2010 (35)
- December 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (5)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (5)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (5)
- September 2008 (8)
- August 2008 (5)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (8)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (14)
- February 2008 (6)
- January 2008 (8)
- December 2007 (14)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (6)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (11)
- June 2007 (8)
- May 2007 (8)
- April 2007 (9)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (10)
- January 2007 (9)
- December 2006 (8)
- November 2006 (17)
- October 2006 (9)
- September 2006 (12)
- August 2006 (8)
- July 2006 (12)
- June 2006 (12)
- May 2006 (8)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (14)
- January 2006 (9)
- December 2005 (19)
- November 2005 (10)
- October 2005 (10)
- September 2005 (18)
- August 2005 (21)
- July 2005 (12)
- June 2005 (9)
- May 2005 (16)
- April 2005 (11)
- March 2005 (12)
- February 2005 (7)
- January 2005 (8)
- December 2004 (15)
- November 2004 (12)
- October 2004 (13)
- September 2004 (3)
- August 2004 (13)
- July 2004 (9)
- June 2004 (11)
- May 2004 (6)
- April 2004 (9)
- March 2004 (8)
- February 2004 (7)
- January 2004 (9)
- December 2003 (7)
- November 2003 (6)
- October 2003 (19)
- September 2003 (12)
- August 2003 (16)
- July 2003 (10)
- June 2003 (6)
- May 2003 (7)
- April 2003 (7)
- March 2003 (4)
April 18th, 2005 @ 4:47 am
Now that would be useful!
PS. I hate typekey – by the time I get through the authentication, I have forgotten what I was going to post
As you can tell from my very insightful comment.
April 23rd, 2005 @ 9:09 am
your solution is lovely, but technically impossible at this time. The metadata isn’t there for this on the vast bulk of websearches. In a site-search, perhaps. Websearch is hard, as many panelists pointed out. really hard.
April 25th, 2005 @ 2:00 pm
I’m there. It’s VERY useful to filter by genre. How do I get there though? Allow/force the search engine to figure it out? (I guess that’s the only option on the public search side.) Or is this another tagging exercise? Another kind of controlled vocab?
I’m on the private/enterprise search side of things and this kind of filtering would be great. Any ideas on approach or implementation?
Thanks for making me think though.
July 19th, 2005 @ 5:29 pm
This idea is tempting but, I suspect, wrong.
It takes me back to the bad old days as an analyst, and as a buyer of analyst services. Analyst deliverables were typically posted online, organized by genre: executive summaries, newsletters, briefing papers, reports. What’s worse, the marketing folks typically made up catchy and meaningless names for these products, like Hot Bytes, so you couldn’t figure out which was which. If you’re looking for content on say, IM market share, you need to slog through every entry, particularly if the search engine was bad (and many were at the time). I’m not convinced that forcing the user to understand the vendor’s arbitrary packaging does much that’s useful.
April 3rd, 2006 @ 9:48 am
Very interesting and professional site! dj valium mp3