What Jeopardy! Reveals About Cognition
Posted on | July 18, 2004 | 7 Comments
Today’s NY Times runs a pretty good article on whether Ken Jennings, the Jeopardy!-million-dollar-winner (and counting) is a genius. It basically gives them an excuse to explore some issues of cognitive science, particularly those related to intelligence. Good stuff.
Also, if you haven’t been watching Ken wipe the floor clean with the brains of his opponents, it really is something to watch.
Comments
7 Responses to “What Jeopardy! Reveals About Cognition”
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Tags
- 2008
- acting
- adaptive path
- advice for interaction design students
- Age
- Amazon
- anatomy
- anthropology
- apple
- basketball
- bioraphies
- birth
- blogging
- book
- book review
- boston
- brain
- brickhouse
- bsg
- bulgaria
- california
- canada
- carsharing
- Chef
- cities
- clearrx
- Coca-Cola
- cognitive psychology
- cognitive science
- comics
- conferences
- Connected
- Connected Age
- consumerism
- corporations
- creativity
- criticism
- culture
- customer experience
- customer research
- design
- design strategy
- design thinking
- documentaries
- documentary
- dog park
- dorothy
- drawings
- economics
- employment
- energy
- events
- experience design
- experiences
- experience strategy
- film
- foocamp
- game
- game design
- genius grant
- happiness
- hbr blog
- history
- idiocy
- Indiana
- industrial design
- information visualization
- innocation
- innovation
- interaction design
- interface design
- iPad
- iphone
- jules
- language
- lazyweb
- learning
- live events
- living room
- management
- maps
- media
- meta
- Microsoft
- mobile
- mobile literacy
- mobile phone
- movie review
- movies
- multi-channel
- museum design
- music
- nba
- needs
- orangutan
- oregon
- organizational design
- organizations
- paper
- parenthood
- personal informatics
- photography
- pixar
- playground
- podcast
- politics
- pop
- Portland
- prehistory
- presentation
- preservation
- presidential race
- process
- product design
- product strategy
- recession
- redwoods
- resignation
- review
- road trip
- Samsung
- san francisco
- satire
- science
- scott mccloud
- Scott Rosenberg
- service design
- siftables
- Skype
- slidecast
- smartphone
- social media
- sofia
- Sun
- synesthesia
- systems design
- systems thinking
- tablet
- target
- tattoos
- technology
- TED
- ted2009
- ted talk
- teevee
- the cloud
- theonion
- theory
- Top
- Top Chef
- toronto
- travel
- trism
- usability
- user experience
- ux week
- uxweek2009
- vaccinations
- video games
- virtual seminar
- web
- web design
- yahoo
- YouTube
- zeitgeist
Hello

Archives
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (9)
- December 2011 (7)
- September 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (7)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (16)
- January 2010 (35)
- December 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (5)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (5)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (5)
- September 2008 (8)
- August 2008 (5)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (8)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (14)
- February 2008 (6)
- January 2008 (8)
- December 2007 (14)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (6)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (11)
- June 2007 (8)
- May 2007 (8)
- April 2007 (9)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (10)
- January 2007 (9)
- December 2006 (8)
- November 2006 (17)
- October 2006 (9)
- September 2006 (12)
- August 2006 (8)
- July 2006 (12)
- June 2006 (12)
- May 2006 (8)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (14)
- January 2006 (9)
- December 2005 (19)
- November 2005 (10)
- October 2005 (10)
- September 2005 (18)
- August 2005 (21)
- July 2005 (12)
- June 2005 (9)
- May 2005 (16)
- April 2005 (11)
- March 2005 (12)
- February 2005 (7)
- January 2005 (8)
- December 2004 (15)
- November 2004 (12)
- October 2004 (13)
- September 2004 (3)
- August 2004 (13)
- July 2004 (9)
- June 2004 (11)
- May 2004 (6)
- April 2004 (9)
- March 2004 (8)
- February 2004 (7)
- January 2004 (9)
- December 2003 (7)
- November 2003 (6)
- October 2003 (19)
- September 2003 (12)
- August 2003 (16)
- July 2003 (10)
- June 2003 (6)
- May 2003 (7)
- April 2003 (7)
- March 2003 (4)
July 19th, 2004 @ 1:58 pm
Sorry, Pal. This NYT article is just another uninformative, empty-headed piece of journalistic space filler. Another example of “nobody knows nothin’ about nothin’” so let’s write an article saying ain’t that innerestin’?
Ken is interesting. Even fascinating. And here in L.A., on ABC, we segue straight from Peter Jennings to Ken Jennings and Ken’s trivia beats Peter’s news every time.
July 20th, 2004 @ 3:21 pm
I’ve got a friend who’s tried out for Jeopardy, Win Ben Stein’s Money, and several other quiz shows. He tells me that each time he’s aced the qualification quiz, but failed the screen test (which is somewhat humorous, given that he’s now got a voice credit in a blockbuster animated film, but…).
I stopped watching Jeopardy (and TV altogether) a while ago, but it sounds like Ken Jennings is someone who managed to score low enough on the qualification quiz that they didn’t reject him for being too smart for their audience, then screen tested well, and is now mopping the floor. It’s not that he’s a brilliant trivialist, there are lots of folks like him, it’s that he’s the smart guy who finally social-engineered the producer’s screening process to get past the usual blocks put in the way of people like that.
July 20th, 2004 @ 3:27 pm
What I wonder is which of three likely scenarios will happen to dethrone Ken? Will he lose on a fluke? Kinda like Fred losing to Crazy Cabbie on Win Fred’s Money (ref: Howard Stern radio show).
Or will the person who beats Ken actually be smarter than Ken, in which case, we’ll have Dick or Jane to watch forever to see them break Ken’s record.
Or maybe people will get tired of Ken (no suspense really) and they’ll change the rules again.
I’m not watching (not much of a game show watcher), but I must admit to being a bit curious to see how this plays out.
July 23rd, 2004 @ 1:38 pm
I think it will likely be a case of Ken FINALLY taking a considerable risk that will avail his departure.
Does anyone know when is the earliest instant a contestant can press that damn buzzer?
(I’m intrigued by the screen test hurdle thing.)
July 23rd, 2004 @ 8:04 pm
Why, Greg, do you think Ken will FINALLY take a considerable risk? That is observeably out of his character. And if he takes that risk, why do you assume it will lead to his demise? Is this a hubris issue? Do you view him as a demi-god who is destined to fly too close to the sun?
August 5th, 2004 @ 6:28 pm
do any of you remember the $64,000?/all the contestants admitted to being given answers to keep the ratings up except the self proclaimed genius Joyce Brothers/if you think she is smart read her books/there are no geniuses/everybody is ignorant: just about different things
September 14th, 2004 @ 8:04 am
Your ultimate video on demand solutions